Resources · Responsibility model
Every obligation
has a name on it.
Between-session care fails quietly when responsibility is implied. This model exists so that nothing in the workflow is owned by “the system” or by no one.
The principle
Unowned obligations block activation.
Before a cohort can be activated, every step of the agreed workflow — participation, preparation, review, response, escalation, coverage, support, and evidence review — must have a named owner. An unresolved obligation is not a footnote; it is a blocker.
Who owns what
Five parties, five distinct duties.
The patient
Chooses what to share and when, within scoped, understandable consent. Participation is voluntary and adjustable.
The clinician
Reviews inputs and drafts, makes every clinical decision, and retains full authority over interpretation and action.
The care team and operations
Own response, handoff, and disposition per the organization’s policy — including who covers what, and when.
The organization
Owns intended use, coverage and escalation policy, activation approvals, and the decision to expand, narrow, or stop.
Peacefull
Owns the platform controls, the boundaries it advertises, the evidence trail, enablement, and support — and stating limits plainly.
What no one is asked to pretend
The model refuses convenient fictions.
Peacefull is not the clinician
It does not diagnose, prescribe, or replace licensed judgment.
Peacefull is not coverage
It does not manufacture after-hours capacity or continuous monitoring.
The EHR is not replaced
The clinical record stays where it is; Peacefull organizes the thread between visits.
Crisis care is not routed through Peacefull
Crisis resources (988, 741741, 911) remain direct at all times.
How it is used
A living document, not a signature ritual.
The responsibility model is drafted in Phase 2, tested against reality during synthetic validation, and reviewed at every evidence checkpoint. When the workflow changes, the model changes first.